Gatefolded vs. Disco: Which Music Sharing Tool Is Right for You?

If you're an independent artist paying for Disco.ac, you might be paying for features you don't need.

Disco is a great platform. It was built by music supervisors and serves the broader music industry—sync teams, labels, publishers, and management companies. If you're managing a catalog of thousands of tracks and pitching for film and TV placements, it's an industry standard for good reason. But most independent artists aren't doing that. They're sharing unreleased demos with their bandmates. They're sending practice recordings to the group chat. They're building setlist playlists before gigs. They're sending downloadable WAVs to their publishing contacts.

Those are all legitimate uses of Disco. But they're also all things you can do with Gatefolded, at a fraction of the cost, and with something Disco doesn't offer at all: a public-facing music page your fans can actually use.

What Disco Is Built For

Disco.ac started as an internal tool for a team of music supervisors. It was designed to organize massive catalogs, pitch playlists to supervisors, track who opened and downloaded what, and manage metadata across thousands of files. Over time it opened up to artists and labels, but its DNA is still enterprise music infrastructure.

If you're a sync agent pitching tracks to Netflix, a label managing 10,000 songs across multiple catalogs, or a publisher coordinating across roster artists, Disco is purpose-built for that workflow. The AI tagging, the catalog management, the pitching tools—that's where the value lives.

But if you're an artist in a couple of bands who needs to share recordings with collaborators and send files to a handful of industry contacts, you're paying for a sync pitching platform when all you need is a music sharing tool.

What Gatefolded Does Differently

Gatefolded was built for independent artists, not sync supervisors. It handles the same core sharing workflows that most artists actually use Disco for:

Private sharing that works. Password-protected links, email allowlists, expiring links, download controls. Send unreleased material to your label, your publisher, your bandmates. You control who hears it and when access expires.

Downloadable files. Share WAV and MP3 files with the people who need them. No hoops, no complexity.

Playlists and organization. Put together a setlist for your band before a gig, or curate a collection for a sync contact. Clean, simple, listenable.

Real-time analytics. See who's listening, what they're playing, how long they stick around. No guessing.

But here's what Disco doesn't give you: a public music page. With Gatefolded, you also get a clean, artist-branded page where fans can actually listen to your music, read lyrics, find your merch and vinyl, and tip you directly. It's a link-in-bio replacement that does more than list links. It plays music.

So instead of paying for one tool to share music privately and another service for your link in bio, you get both in one place.

The Price Difference

This is where it gets hard to ignore.

At Disco's cheapest tier, you're paying more than double what Gatefolded costs per year. At their Pro level, you're paying six times more. And both of those Disco plans cap you at 500 or 1,000 tracks.

For the price of two or three months of Disco, you get a full year of Gatefolded—plus a public music page that actually serves your fans.

So Which One Should You Use?

Use Disco if:

• You manage a large catalog (thousands of tracks) for sync licensing
• You need to pitch directly to music supervisors through their marketplace
• You're a label, publisher, or sync agent who needs enterprise-level catalog tools
• AI-powered tagging and discovery features are part of your workflow

Use Gatefolded if:

• You're an independent artist sharing music with your band, label, or publishing contacts
• You want private sharing AND a public music page in one tool
• You don't need sync pitching infrastructure
• You'd rather spend $49/year than $120 to $300/year for a different feature set

There's no shade toward Disco here. It's a powerful platform that serves a real need in the industry. But if you're an artist paying monthly for a sync pitching tool because the private sharing works well, it's worth asking whether you actually need everything you're paying for.